* Royce Ausburn (royce...@inomial.com) wrote: > Just a question: is the utility great enough to warrant me working further > on this? I have no real desire to implement this particular feature -- I > simply saw an opportunity to cut my teeth on something easy. I'd be happy to > find something on the TODO list instead if this feature isn't really > worthwhile.
Seeing as how it's already got one committer willing to consider it (and that one tends to go the other direction on new features..), I'd definitely say it's worthwhile. That doesn't mean it's guaranteed to get in, but I'd put the probability above 75% given that feedback. That's pretty good overall. :) > Tom's suggestion looks like it's less trivial that I can do just yet, but > I'll take a look and ask for help if I need it. Don't let the notion of fiddling with the catalogs (system tables) discourage you.. It's really not all *that* bad. What you will need to figure out (and which I don't recall offhand..) is if you can just update those catalogs directly from VACUUM or if you need to go through the statistics collecter (which involves a bit of UDP communication, but hopefully we've abstracted that out enough that you won't have to deal with it directly really..). Looking at an existing example case where VACUUM is doing something that updates the stat tables (such as under the 'ANALYZE' option) will help out a lot, I'm sure. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature