On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I reviewed your patch. I think it is in good shape, my two main remarks > (name of n_unremovable_tup and a remark about documentation at the end of > this review) are highly subjective and I wouldn't spend time on it unless > other people have the same opinion.
I share your opinion; it's not obvious to me what this means either. I guess this is a dumb question, but why don't we remove all the dead tuples? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
