On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 11:32 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> Looking at the patch, I noticed that it's possible to specify the default
>> boundaries ([], [), (] or ()) per individual float type with the
>> DEFAULT_FLAGS clause of CREATE TYPE .. AS RANGE. I wonder if that doesn't
>> do more harm then good - it makes it impossible to deduce the meaning of
>> e.g. numericrange(1.0, 2.0) without looking up the definition of 
>> numericrange.
>> I suggest we pick one set of default boundaries, ideally '[)' since that
>> is what all the built-in canonization functions produce, and stick with it.
> Done.
> Also, made the range parsing even more like records with more code
> copied verbatim. And fixed some parsing tests along the way.

When I apply this to head, "make check" fails with:

  create type textrange_en_us as range(subtype=text, collation="en_US");
+ ERROR:  collation "en_US" for encoding "SQL_ASCII" does not exist

Is this a problem?  e.g. will it break the build-farm?

"make check LANG=en_US" does pass



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to