On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It also strikes me that anything >> that is based on augmenting the walsender/walreceiver protocol leaves >> anyone who is using WAL shipping out in the cold. I'm not clear from >> the comments you or Simon have made how important you think that use >> case still is. > > archive_timeout > 0 works just fine at generating files even when > quiet, or if it does not, it is a bug. > > So I don't understand your comments, please explain.
If the standby has restore_command set but not primary_conninfo, then it will never make a direct connection to the master. So anything that's based on extending that protocol won't get used in that case. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
