On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > > I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment: > do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It > will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store > it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand? >
fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the info locally and send it on demand. about the _short_desc functions, i added that because i wanted to understand what was happening during recovery and the wal_record_type (xl_info) being a number is not that clear -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
