On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> >> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment: >> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It >> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store >> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand? >> > > fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the > info locally and send it on demand.
Jaime, are you planning to submit the updated version of the patch? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
