On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 23 July 2012 16:09, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, what this really boils down to is that you and Peter don't
>> like this line of code:
>>
>> +               tss->buflen1 = TYPEALIGN(TEXTBUFLEN, len1);
>
> I can only speak for myself, though I agree with your summary here.
>
>> What would you like it to say instead?
>>
>> The obvious formulation is:
>>
>> while (len1 < tss->buflen1)
>>     tss->buflen *= 2;
>
> That's what I had in mind. +1.
>
>> Or perhaps the following, which will normally be more efficient,
>> though possibly not as efficient as what I've got there now:
>>
>> tss->buflen = 1 << ffs(len1);
>
> I'm sorry, I don't follow you here. What is ffs() ?

Sorry, fls, not ffs.  I always get those mixed up.

See src/port/fls.c

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to