On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Do you think you can follow through on this soon, Robert? I don't > believe that there are any outstanding issues. I'm not going to make > an issue of the fact that strxfrm() hasn't been taken advantage of. If > you could please post a new revision, with the suggested alterations > (that you agree with), I'd be happy to take another look.
I don't have any plans to work on this further. I think all of the criticism that has been leveled at this patch is 100% bogus, and I greatly dislike the changes that have been proposed. That may not be fair, but it's how I feel, and in light of that feeling it does not make sense for me to pursue this. Sorry. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers