Hannu Krosing <ha...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On further thought the function name should just be what it is defined
> in postgresql, like this
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a,b,c) AS $$
> import x
> from __future__ import nex_cool_feature
> def helper_function(x):
> ...
> def foo(a,b,c):
> defined function body here
> def bar(i,j):
> function body for bar(i,j)
> $$ language plpythonu;
>> but this would not be backwards compatible, at least not in any
>> obvious way.
> This is still unfortunately true :(
Could we say that *if* the function text contains a line beginning
"def function_name" then we interpret it as above, otherwise oldstyle?
I'm not sure how big a risk of false positives there'd be.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
