On 12/16/2012 07:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Hannu Krosing <ha...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:On further thought the function name should just be what it is defined in postgresql, like this CREATE FUNCTION foo(a,b,c) AS $$ def foo(a,b,c):BTW, how well will that play with overloaded function names? I don't particularly care for saying that PL/Python fails if you overload a function name across multiple schemas or argument lists ...
Currently each pl/python function gets compiled in its own python module namespace, so this is not be a problem .
-------------- Hannu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
