Hannu Krosing <ha...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On further thought the function name should just be what it is defined
>> in postgresql, like this
>> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a,b,c) AS $$
>> def foo(a,b,c):
BTW, how well will that play with overloaded function names? I don't
particularly care for saying that PL/Python fails if you overload a
function name across multiple schemas or argument lists ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
