On 27 March 2013 21:05, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Same argument applies to all conf files, not just recovery.conf. >> >> Sounds like the patch to add -R to pg_basebackup should be revoked as >> being not well thought out. Or it should be fixed, in which case this >> works the same. > > What exactly was wrong with pg_basebackup -R, without > recovery_config_directory? You asked me to answer the question. I did. Please answer mine. Why do you think recovery_config_directory are different to config_file with respect to pg_basebackup? It looks like you've discovered a problem with pg_basebackup, not a problem with this patch. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
