On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> I think it's a waste of code to try to handle bushy trees. A list is >> not a particularly efficient representation of the pending list; this >> will probably be slower than recusing in the common case. I'd suggest >> keeping the logic to handle left-deep trees, which I find rather >> elegant, but ditching the pending list. > > Is there going to be further discussion of this patch, or do I return it?
Considering it's not been updated, nor my comments responded to, in almost two weeks, I think we return it at this point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers