On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> I think it's a waste of code to try to handle bushy trees.  A list is
>> not a particularly efficient representation of the pending list; this
>> will probably be slower than recusing in the common case.  I'd suggest
>> keeping the logic to handle left-deep trees, which I find rather
>> elegant, but ditching the pending list.
> Is there going to be further discussion of this patch, or do I return it?

Considering it's not been updated, nor my comments responded to, in
almost two weeks, I think we return it at this point.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to