2013/8/29 David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com> > On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > >> You have yet to supply any arguments which support this position. > > > > I am not convinced that's enough of a reason, but the requirement to use > > PERFORM for SELECTs that aren't stored anywhere actually has prevented > > bugs for me. I am not convinced that's worth the cost since I also have > > been annoyed by it several times, but it's not as crystal clear as you > > paint it. > > So now we can revise Josh’s assertion to: “I have seen only tepid, > unconvincing arguments which support this position.” > > I have thought that PERFORM was useful to mark queries that discard > results in the past, but I think now that the mental load is higher, even > if it can be fixed with CTEs, it’s more trouble than it’s worth. >
when we fix a correct call of VOID function, then half of problem goes out. Second half is subjective. I remember, some years ago there was a proposal to change syntax and remove all verbosity features from PL/pgSQL - for example - using only END instead END IF, END LOOP, ... For me, this talk is similar - we have a language, that was designed be secure and verbose, what means, so developer must to write some chars more. You cannot to have both - short language and secure. Regards Pavel > > Best, > > David > >
