On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > > One thing I noticed - in MSVC, the config parameter "krb5" (equivalent of > > the removed --with-krb5) enabled *both* krb5 and gssapi, and there is no > > separate config parameter for gssapi. Do we want to rename that one to > > "gss", or do we want to keep it as "krb5"? Renaming it would break > > otherwise working environments, but it's kind of weird to leave it... > > +1 for renaming --- anybody who's building with "krb5" and expecting to, > you know, actually *get* krb5 would probably rather find out about this > change at build time instead of down the road a ways. > > A compromise position would be to introduce a gss parameter while leaving > krb5 in place as a deprecated (perhaps undocumented?) synonym for it. > But I think that's basically confusing. > Yeah, I'm not sure it actually helps much. Andrew - is this going to cause any issues wrt the buildfarm, by any chance? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
