On 2014-02-19 09:24:03 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn...
> > Should I register this patch somewhere to avoid having it lost in the void?
> > Regards,
> Well, I committed this, but the buildfarm's deeply unhappy with it.
> Apparently the use of GET_8_BYTES() and SET_8_BYTES() is no good on
> some platforms...  and I'm not sure what to do about that, right
> off-hand.

The relevant bit probably is:

pg_lsn.c: In function 'pg_lsn_out':
pg_lsn.c:59:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'GET_8_BYTES' 

GET_8_BYTES only exists for 64bit systems.


Andres Freund

 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to