On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > Perhaps this type should be called pglsn, since it's an > implementation-specific detail and not a universal concept like int, > point, or uuid.
If we're going to do that, I suggest pg_lsn rather than pglsn. We already have pg_node_tree, so using underscores for separation would be more consistent. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
