On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn... > Should I register this patch somewhere to avoid having it lost in the void? > Regards,
Well, I committed this, but the buildfarm's deeply unhappy with it. Apparently the use of GET_8_BYTES() and SET_8_BYTES() is no good on some platforms... and I'm not sure what to do about that, right off-hand. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
