On 2014-04-24 09:39:21 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I can't find that this discussion actually came to a proper consensus, but > I may be missing something. Did we go with pg_recvlogical just because we > couldn't decide on a better name, or did we intentionally decide it was the > best?
I went with pg_recvlogical because that's where the (small) majority seemed to be. Even if I was unconvinced. There were so many outstanding big fights at that point that I didn't want to spend my time on this ;) Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers