On 2014-04-24 09:46:07 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com>wrote: > > > On 2014-04-24 09:39:21 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > I can't find that this discussion actually came to a proper consensus, > > but > > > I may be missing something. Did we go with pg_recvlogical just because we > > > couldn't decide on a better name, or did we intentionally decide it was > > the > > > best? > > > > I went with pg_recvlogical because that's where the (small) majority > > seemed to be. Even if I was unconvinced. There were so many outstanding > > big fights at that point that I didn't want to spend my time on this ;) > > > > > I was guessing something like the second part there, which is why I figured > this would be a good time to bring this fight back up to the surface ;)
I have to admit that I still don't care too much. By now I'd tentatively want to stay with the current name because that's what I got used to, but if somebody else has strong opinions and finds concensus... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
