> The patch looks somewhat complicated and bugs can be easily introduced > because it tries to not only add new feature but also reorganize the main > loop in HandleCopyStream at the same time. To keep the patch simple, I'm > thinking to firstly apply the attached patch which just refactors the > main loop. Then we can apply the main patch, i.e., add new feature. > Thought? Thank you for the refactoring patch. I did a review of the patch. As a result, I found the calculation of sleeptime when the --status-intarvall is set to 1 was incorrect.
--status-intarvall 1 --> sleeptime 1.9999 !? --status-intarvall 2 --> sleeptime 1.9999 OK --status-intarvall 3 --> sleeptime 2.9999 OK Regards, -- Furuya Osamu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers