Philip Warner wrote:
> I just reread the patch; is it valid to assume fseek and fseeko have the 
> same  failure modes? Or does the call to 'fseek' actually call fseeko?

The fseek was a typo.  It should have been fseeko as you suggested.
CVS updated.

Your idea of using SEEK_SET is good, except I was concerned that the
checkSeek call will move the file pointer.  Is that OK?  It doesn't seem

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Reply via email to