2014-08-21 17:58 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk>:

> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
>  >> I agree, the contrib/cube patch as posted is purely so we could test
>  >> everything without having to argue over the new name first.
>
>  Tom> I wonder if you've tried hard enough to avoid reserving the keyword.
>
> GROUP BY cube(a,b)  is currently legal syntax and means something
> completely
> incompatible to what the spec requires.
>
> GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (cube(a,b), c)  -- is that cube(a,b) an expression
> to group on, or a list of grouping sets to expand?
>
> GROUP BY (cube(a,b)) -- should that be an error, or silently treat it
> as a function call rather than a grouping set? What about GROUP BY
> GROUPING SETS ((cube(a,b)) ? (both are errors in our patch)
>
> Accepting those as valid implies a degree of possible confusion that I
> personally regard as quite questionable.  Previous discussion seemed to
> have accepted that contrib/cube was going to have to be renamed.
>
>  Tom> I think that the cube extension is not going to be the only
>  Tom> casualty if "cube" becomes a reserved word --- that seems like a
>  Tom> name that could be in use in lots of applications.  ("What do
>  Tom> you mean, 9.5 breaks our database for tracking office space?")
>  Tom> It would be worth quite a bit of effort to avoid that.
>
> It has been a reserved word in the spec since, what, 1999? and it is a
> reserved word in mssql, oracle, db2, etc.?
>
> It only needs to be a col_name_keyword, so it still works as a table
> or column name (as usual we are less strict than the spec in that
> respect).  I'm looking into whether it can be made unreserved, but I
> have serious doubts about this being a good idea.
>

+1

contrib module should be renamed - more - current name is confusing against
usual functionality related to words CUBE and ROLLUP

Pavel


>
> --
> Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

Reply via email to