On 2014-09-07 15:05:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Tom, are you planning to take this one?
> Yeah, I already looked at it once, so will take it.
> I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on
> the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as
> is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ...
Just reread that part of the thread and personally I disliked all the
other suggested names more than width_bucket.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: