On 2014-09-07 15:05:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Tom, are you planning to take this one? > > Yeah, I already looked at it once, so will take it.
Cool. > I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on > the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as > is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ... Just reread that part of the thread and personally I disliked all the other suggested names more than width_bucket. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers