* Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 2014-12-22 12:12:12 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > We might end up turning the autovacuum process into a generalized
> > scheduler/cron-like entity that way though.
> I'm not talking about autovacuum, just plain vacuumdb.

Oh, right, clearly I was thinking of autovacuum.  Adding an option like
that to vacuumdb would certainly be a lot more straight-forward.

> > I'd rather we just build
> > that.  Users would then be able to run a script periodically which
> > would add VACUUM commands to be run on whichever tables they want to
> > the jobs queue, either for immediate execution or at whatever time they
> > want (or possibly chronically :).
> And this discussion just feature creeped beyond anything realistic... :)

Yeah, but I really *want* this... ;)



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to