On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > > > There's one argument for supporting more for VACUUM than the rest - it > > > can't be executed directly as the result of a query as the others > > > can... I wonder if that'd not better be answered by adding a feature to > > > vacuumdb that allows selecting the to-be-vacuumed table by a user > > > defined query. > > > > Wow. That's certainly an interesting idea. > > +1. >
Then to simplify can we allow the "--table" option of vacuumdb act similar to the "--table" option of pg_dump?? Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
