On 12/23/14, 7:44 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:
I would MUCH rather that we find a way to special-case executing
non-transactional commands dynamically, because VACUUM isn't the only one
that suffers from this problem.
Is pg_background a solution to this problem?
Yes, since it allows you to do "autonomous transactions". It's probably not the
most efficient way to solve this, but it should work.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
