On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> I took a look through the patch and the discussion and it certainly
> seems ready to me.  I agree with Robert- let's go ahead and get this in
> and then folks can build on top of it.  I'm guessing it was added as
> "Needs Review" since that's the default for a new entry, but it's
> clearly had review from multiple people, committers and non-committers
> alike, so I went ahead and marked it as 'ready for committer' to make
> that clear to folks looking at the CF app.
>
> Robert, as this is mostly your code (and you're marked as author on the
> CF app), do you want to do the actual commit, or are you impartial, or
> would you prefer someone else handle it, or..?  I'm interested in this
> also and would be happy to help in any way I can.

Yeah, I'll take care of it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to