On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > I took a look through the patch and the discussion and it certainly > seems ready to me. I agree with Robert- let's go ahead and get this in > and then folks can build on top of it. I'm guessing it was added as > "Needs Review" since that's the default for a new entry, but it's > clearly had review from multiple people, committers and non-committers > alike, so I went ahead and marked it as 'ready for committer' to make > that clear to folks looking at the CF app. > > Robert, as this is mostly your code (and you're marked as author on the > CF app), do you want to do the actual commit, or are you impartial, or > would you prefer someone else handle it, or..? I'm interested in this > also and would be happy to help in any way I can.
Yeah, I'll take care of it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers