Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > But autovacuum is still manufacturing a VacuumStmt by hand. If we want > to get rid of that, I think it'd work to have a new > ExecVacuum(VacuumStmt, params) function which is called from > standard_ProcessUtility and does just vacuum(rel, relid, params). > Autovacuum on the other hand can call vacuum() without having to > construct the parse node.
Why would we want to get rid of that? A struct is a handy and legible way to pass a pile of parameters. I doubt it would be an improvement for vacuum() to grow a long list of separate parameters. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers