On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > - 0001 is the previous one >> > - 0002 removes VacuumStmt from the call stack of ANALYZE and VACUUM >> > routines >> > - 0003 moves for_wraparound in VacuumParams. >> >> Yeah, I think something like this could be a sensible approach. > > But autovacuum is still manufacturing a VacuumStmt by hand. If we want > to get rid of that, I think it'd work to have a new > ExecVacuum(VacuumStmt, params) function which is called from > standard_ProcessUtility and does just vacuum(rel, relid, params). > Autovacuum on the other hand can call vacuum() without having to > construct the parse node.
+1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers