Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > To do it before every minor release would require re-indenting HEAD > > as well (since the whole point is to keep HEAD and the back branches > > consistent). I think we'd get too much push-back from developers > > whose pending patches got broken. We can get away with reindenting > > HEAD between development cycles, but probably not more often than that. > > I'm not convinced of that. If we did it more often, it might actually > be less disruptive.
I believe it's possible to mechanically rebase a patch over an indent run of the underlying branch with half a dozen commands or less. +1 for reindenting all branches before each minor release, FWIW. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
