Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> To do it before every minor release would require re-indenting HEAD >>> as well (since the whole point is to keep HEAD and the back branches >>> consistent). I think we'd get too much push-back from developers >>> whose pending patches got broken. We can get away with reindenting >>> HEAD between development cycles, but probably not more often than that.
>> I'm not convinced of that. If we did it more often, it might actually >> be less disruptive. > I believe it's possible to mechanically rebase a patch over an indent > run of the underlying branch with half a dozen commands or less. +1 for > reindenting all branches before each minor release, FWIW. Yeah? Can you show an example? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers