Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:53:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (BTW, one practical issue is where would we get typedef lists relevant
>> to the back branches. I'm not sure if the buildfarm infrastructure is
>> capable of collecting branch-specific data, or if we'd need to rather
>> than just using a union of all branches' typedefs.)
> Uh, I just happen to commit the typedef list file used for the pgindent
> run in src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list, per branch, so we would just
> use the same file. If typedefs were added in a backbranch (unlikely),
> we probably wouldn't want to use them anyway.
Not sure why you think it's unlikely; a back-patched commit could easily
add one. And if it did, we'd want pgindent to treat it the same as in
HEAD, else the whole point of this is gone.
(Come to think of it, that argument means we *do* want to use the same
typedef list in every branch, if we're to do this at all.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
