Szymon Lipiński wrote: > Then I need to read through the emails. This is not user friendly too, as I > need to click through the email tree, and if an email has multiple replies, > it is usually hard not to omit some of them, as after going into a reply, I > need to click to get to the parent mail again.
Evidently, the "flat" link is easy to miss. Give it a try. The bug tracker is not intended as a feature-request tracker, anyway. Those two things are very different, even if many projects just conflate the two things. > Personally I'd also change sending patches in emails to github pull > requests :). That won't happen, at least not this decade. > ... or maybe the difference is more in the data structure, the email > discussion is a tree (with a horrible interface to the archive) while in a > bug tracker, the discussion is linear, and easier to follow. FWIW in my opinion our mailing list archives interface is the best there is --- and I disagree that the linear discussion is easy to follow, except for trivial discussions. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
