> > We have to use something OSS; open source projects depending on > > closed-source infra is bad news. Out of what's available, I'd actually > > choose Bugzilla; as much as BZ frustrates the heck out of me at times, > > it's the only OSS tracker that's at all sophisticated.
Josh, I'm not sure I agree here on the BT needing to be OSS. That said not sure its my call :) > ... The above-referenced individuals > would be the bug tracking system curators, of course. Unless it's got > serious technical issues, the infrastructure team will do our best to > support the choice. On the other hand, some of us would likely be > involved in bug curation also. Stephen, In digging around more I found this wiki page that seems to be the closest thing to a BT: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo Is the curation already being done? If the contents of that wiki page were injected into a BT, would that be enough of a start? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
