On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:33:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> How did you figure >> that that was the version used, anyway? > > I asked Bruce at one point.
So we are trying to use the same version over the years to keep code consistent across back-branches? Do you think we should try to use a newer version instead with each pgindent run? That would induce a rebasing cost when back-patching, but we cannot stay with the same version of perltidy forever either... -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
