On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com>
> >> There are quite a few contributing companies that likely have people
> >> could help out with this in an educated fashion but aren't coders.
> > Sort of like how they could also have helped out with cf management?
> Dunno about that. While a CF manager doesn't necessarily have to have
> a commit bit, I think he/she probably does have to be someone who is known
> and respected on the -hackers list. Otherwise, nagging to finish patches
> is likely to be ignored or even counterproductive.
I realize now that I caught JDs response slightly out of context. I thought
we were talking issue/bugtracker, in which case I think that is needed just
as much as it is for a CF manager. As it's basically the same thing just at
a different stage.
But that one seems to be more about keeping the todo list on the wiki up to
date, in which case I agree, not as much is needed. Because it's more
reflecting what's happened, rather than trying to manage process.