Robert Haas wrote: > The eventual committer is likely to be much happier with this patch if > you guys have achieved consensus among yourselves on the best > approach. > > (Disclaimer: The eventual committer won't be me. I'm not a Python > guy. But we try to proceed by consensus rather than committer-dictat > around here, when we can. Obviously the committer has the final say > at some level, but it's better if that power doesn't need to be > exercised too often.)
Actually I imagine that if there's no agreement between author and first reviewer, there might not *be* a committer in the first place. Perhaps try to get someone else to think about it and make a decision. It is possible that some other committer is able to decide by themselves but I wouldn't count on it. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
