Robert Haas wrote:

> The eventual committer is likely to be much happier with this patch if
> you guys have achieved consensus among yourselves on the best
> approach.
> (Disclaimer: The eventual committer won't be me.  I'm not a Python
> guy.  But we try to proceed by consensus rather than committer-dictat
> around here, when we can.  Obviously the committer has the final say
> at some level, but it's better if that power doesn't need to be
> exercised too often.)

Actually I imagine that if there's no agreement between author and first
reviewer, there might not *be* a committer in the first place.  Perhaps
try to get someone else to think about it and make a decision.  It is
possible that some other committer is able to decide by themselves but I
wouldn't count on it.

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to