Dne 2. 2. 2016 7:30 napsal uživatel "Catalin Iacob" <iacobcata...@gmail.com
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
> > Dne 29. 1. 2016 18:09 napsal uživatel "Catalin Iacob"
> > <iacobcata...@gmail.com>:
> >> Looking at the output above, I don't see who would rely on calling
> >> plpy.error with multiple arguments and getting the tuple so I'm
> >> actually in favor of just breaking backward compatibility. Note that
> >> passing multiple arguments isn't even documented. So I would just
> >> change debug, info, error and friends to do what raise_debug,
> >> raise_info, raise_error do. With a single argument behavior stays the
> >> same, with multiple arguments one gets more useful behavior (detail,
> >> hint) instead of the useless tuple. That's my preference but we can
> >> leave the patch with raise and leave the decision to the committer.
> >>
> >
> > if breaking compatibility, then raise* functions are useless, and
should be
> > removed.
> Indeed. I think it's better to change the existing functions and break
> compatibility instead of adding the raise_ functions. But the
> committer will decide if that's what should be done. Since you wrote
> the patch with raise_* I propose you keep it that way for now and let
> the committer decide. I wrote the doc patch based on raise_* as well.

If we decided to break compatibility, then we have to do explicitly. Thid
discussion can continue with commiter, but send path with duplicitly
defined functions has not sense for me. Currently I out of office, so I
cannot to clean it. 4.2 I should to work usually

> Attached is the doc patch (made on top of your patch). I'll wait for
> you to combine them and switch to raising Error and then hopefully
> this is ready for a committer to look at.

Reply via email to