* Joe Conway (m...@joeconway.com) wrote: > On 02/05/2016 10:16 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > An in-core auditing solution would provide us with proper grammar > > support, ability to directly mark objects for auditing in the catalog, > > allow us to much more easily maintain auditing capability over time as > > a small incremental bit of work for each new feature (with proper > > in-core infrastructure for it) and generally be a far better technical > > solution. Leveraging the GRANT system is quite cute, and does work, but > > it's certainly non-intuitive and is only because we've got no better > > way, due to it being implemented as an extension. > > I think one additional item needed would be the ability for the audit > logs to be sent to a different location than the standard logs.
Indeed, reworking the logging to be supportive of multiple destinations with tagging of the source, etc, has long been a desire of mine (and others), though that's largely independent of auditing itself. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature