On 02/05/2016 10:16 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > An in-core auditing solution would provide us with proper grammar > support, ability to directly mark objects for auditing in the catalog, > allow us to much more easily maintain auditing capability over time as > a small incremental bit of work for each new feature (with proper > in-core infrastructure for it) and generally be a far better technical > solution. Leveraging the GRANT system is quite cute, and does work, but > it's certainly non-intuitive and is only because we've got no better > way, due to it being implemented as an extension.
I think one additional item needed would be the ability for the audit logs to be sent to a different location than the standard logs. > To make true progress towards that, however, we need to get past > the thinking that auditing doesn't need to be in-core or that it should > be a second-class citizen feature or that we don't need it in PG. +1 Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
Description: OpenPGP digital signature