Dave Cramer says it is needed for the jdbc spec, somehow. It seems kind
of odd so I don't want to make too complex an implementation.


Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > My idea on this after chat with Dave was to add a GUC option that puts
> > the schema.table.column name as the default column label, rather than
> > just the column name.
> Can someone explain why this is needed at all?  There is a reason why the
> SQL standard does not provide for this information: it's not well defined.
> Are you trying to make up a poor substitute for updatable views?
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to