On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9 March 2016 at 07:18, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: >> Many of "needs review" state patches already have reviewer(s). Do you >> mean we want more reviewers in addition to them for such patches? > > Yeah. Personally I'm not too confident about what precisely is required to > move a patch from needs-review to ready-for-committer. I've done a chunk of > review for a number of patches, but I'm not always confident saying "all > clear, proceed".
I think that if you've done your best to review it, and you don't see any remaining problems, you should mark it Ready for Committer. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers