On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 07:18, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Many of "needs review" state patches already have reviewer(s). Do you
>> mean we want more reviewers in addition to them for such patches?
> Yeah. Personally I'm not too confident about what precisely is required to
> move a patch from needs-review to ready-for-committer. I've done a chunk of
> review for a number of patches, but I'm not always confident saying "all
> clear, proceed".

I think that if you've done your best to review it, and you don't see
any remaining problems, you should mark it Ready for Committer.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to