On 29/03/16 03:06, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
OK, sounds good.


Just a side-note. Andres has pushed the fix for the GinIs* macros as
af4472bc, making patch 0003 from the last series useless now.

I'm not prepared to get very involved in this patch series since I am
not a Windows guy, but I went ahead and pushed 0001 anyway.  I'm not
sure that we want to commit 0002 without a BF machine.  Can anybody
help with that?


I have machine ready, waiting for animal name and secret. It will obviously fail until we push the 0002 and 0004 though.

--
  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to