On 3/29/16 11:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Steele wrote:
On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact
solution compared to these others. Under what circumstances would you
be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway?
In pgaudit the log level for audit messages is user configurable but this
was mostly added for testing purposes on the client side. I don't think it
would be a big deal to force the level to LOG when client output is
suppressed.
So audit records would use COMMERROR? That sounds really bad to me.
I'm not a big fan of it myself but my ideas don't seem to be getting any
traction...
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
