Alvaro Herrera <> writes:
> David Steele wrote:
>> On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact
>>> solution compared to these others.  Under what circumstances would you
>>> be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway?

> So audit records would use COMMERROR?  That sounds really bad to me.

My proposal would be to invent a new elevel macro, maybe LOG_ONLY,
for this purpose.  But under the hood it'd be the same as COMMERROR.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to