Hi, On 2016-04-07 09:14:00 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have ran exactly same test on intel x86 m/c and the results are as below:
Thanks for running these tests! > Client Count/Patch_ver (tps) 2 128 256 > HEAD – Commit 2143f5e1 2832 35001 26756 > clog_buf_128 2909 50685 40998 > clog_buf_128 +group_update_clog_v8 2981 53043 50779 > clog_buf_128 +content_lock 2843 56261 54059 > clog_buf_128 +nocontent_lock 2630 56554 54429 Interesting. could you perhaps also run a test with -btpcb-like@1 -bselect-only@3? That much represents real world loads, and it's where I saw simon's approach outshining yours considerably... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
