On 2016-04-08 13:07:05 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > I think by now, we have done many tests with both approaches and we find > that in some cases, it is slightly better and in most cases it is neutral > and in some cases it is worse than group clog approach. I feel we should > go with group clog approach now as that has been tested and reviewed > multiple times and in future if we find that other approach is giving > substantial gain, then we can anyway change it.
I think that's a discussion for the 9.7 cycle unfortunately. I've now pushed the #clog-buffers patch; that's going to help the worst cases. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers