On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2016-04-07 18:40:14 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > This is the data with -b tpcb-like@1 with 20-min run for each version and I > > could see almost similar results as the data posted in previous e-mail. > > > > Client Count/Patch_ver (tps) 256 > > clog_buf_128 40617 > > clog_buf_128 +group_clog_v8 51137 > > clog_buf_128 +content_lock 54188 > > > > For -b select-only@3, I have done quicktest for each version and number is > > same 62K~63K for all version, why do you think this will improve > > select-only workload? > > What I was looking for was pgbench with both -btpcb-like@1 > -bselect-only@3 specified; i.e. a mixed read/write test. >
Okay, I can again take the performance data, but on what basis are we ignoring the variation of results on power m/c, previous to this I have not seen such a variation for read-write tests. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
