On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2016-04-07 09:14:00 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have ran exactly same test on intel x86 m/c and the results are as below: > > Thanks for running these tests! > > > Client Count/Patch_ver (tps) 2 128 256 > > HEAD – Commit 2143f5e1 2832 35001 26756 > > clog_buf_128 2909 50685 40998 > > clog_buf_128 +group_update_clog_v8 2981 53043 50779 > > clog_buf_128 +content_lock 2843 56261 54059 > > clog_buf_128 +nocontent_lock 2630 56554 54429 > > Interesting. > > could you perhaps also run a test with -btpcb-like@1 -bselect-only@3? >
This is the data with -b tpcb-like@1 with 20-min run for each version and I could see almost similar results as the data posted in previous e-mail. Client Count/Patch_ver (tps) 256 clog_buf_128 40617 clog_buf_128 +group_clog_v8 51137 clog_buf_128 +content_lock 54188 For -b select-only@3, I have done quicktest for each version and number is same 62K~63K for all version, why do you think this will improve select-only workload? With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
